Thread:Queermemes1312/@comment-45142442-20200715140658/@comment-45217385-20200716052001

XxPolanskixX wrote: You say its a bad thing to say are their own sexualities, yes they are similar in attraction but they aren't the same sexuality - me saying that is not biphobic ffs.

They aren't forms of bisexuality and they aren't microlabels. They're they own sexualities and wow guess i'm biphobic now wow 🙄. I've already explained why making them their own sexualities separate from bisexuality is almost always biphobic and leads to bi erasure. I'm not going to keep explaining my points. Bisexuality has always meant attraction to two or more (usually all) genders. It has always been defined as an intentionally fluid identity and one that is outside of the socially constructed gender binary. Do you wonder why ply, omni, and pan are "similar in attraction"? It's because they are bisexual microlabels, not their own separate sexualities. I don't know how else to explain to you that separating them in the ways that you have is biphobic.

Btw I'm not saying that you are inherently biphobic, I'm saying that the points you're making are. Just so you know.